
A. Howard Community College was founded to provide opportunities for higher education to a broad range of students. The educational program has three major objectives:
Basic commitment to the development of students through quality teaching and effective advising or related activities is of primary importance. A broad approach to student development and to addressing the needs of a diverse student population is the major responsibility of every instructor. B. Full-time faculty are evaluated based on performance in these areas:
C. Howard Community College is committed to maximizing student learning and success. To accomplish this goal, all faculty are expected to perform at a meritorious level. The expectations for meritorious level performance are as follows:
Each faculty member is expected to teach 14 - 16 units per semester. Over the course of two consecutive years, a faculty member is expected to average 30 units per year. When administrative or other duties are assigned beyond the normal workload expectations, a class load reduction may be granted by the vice president of academic affairs.
1 This assumes that each member of the team is in the class at least 50% of the time. The unit value may be more or less depending on the time commitment of the team members. 2 Large classes must be approved by the vice president of academic affairs. The unit value may be more or less than 1.5 depending on the nature of the class. A large class is normally 45 or more students. Unique Credits: Every attempt will be made to ensure that no faculty member teaches more than 9 unique credits in a semester. When possible, only 6 or 7 unique credits will be assigned. When a faculty member is required by the division chair to teach 12 or 13 unique credits, this will constitute a full class load (15 units) for the semester. Only under the most unusual circumstances would a faculty member be expected to or be permitted to teach 4 unique preps on a regular basis. Every attempt will be made to ensure that no faculty member teaches more than 18 unique credits a year. When a faculty member is required by the division chair to teach more than 18 unique credits in a year, a decision will be made by the vice president of academic affairs as to whether an additional course load reduction will be awarded.
Faculty are expected to maintain at least five office hours scheduled over at least four days per week.
Faculty are expected to demonstrate quality teaching by:
Faculty are expected to participate in the development and implementation of plans to measure student learning. These measures will be focused on learning in the total educational program of a student and will include measures of value-added projects and comparisons with national and/or regional data. If deficiencies are found, faculty are expected to participate in program or course modifications designed to improve student learning in the areas of deficiency. As needed by the division, the faculty will participate in approved learning outcomes assessment projects.
Faculty are expected to attend and actively participate in meetings, stay informed, respond promptly to requests for information, participate in commencement ceremonies and other significant institutional events, work cooperatively, respectfully, and effectively with peers, support staff, and administrators, use appropriate communication channels, carry out other tasks vital to the institution. These activities normally take 60 hours yearly.
Faculty are expected to spend around 80 hours yearly on activities selected from the following list:
Every effort will be made to let faculty select activities from this category. However, once every three years the faculty should participate in some college-wide activity or community service. Also, the division chair may need to make specific assignments in order to ensure that the work of the division and college can be accomplished. This may include assignment to special projects of no more than 20 hours in length. When possible, special projects beyond 20 hours will be assigned as negotiated projects. D. Faculty are expected to spend around 140 hours per year in a combination of teaching improvement, professional development, and program development activities. Both professional development activities and a teaching improvement project must be completed each year. Program development activities are optional depending on the needs of the individual faculty member's program. Every three years (or the equivalent in multiple years) a substantial portion of the time in this category should be spent in professional development activities designed to update knowledge and skills and must involve significant off-campus activities.
A teaching and learning improvement project with a feedback component is required each year. Although not all teaching improvement activities in this category require a feedback component, at least one activity each year must include a feedback component. Examples of teaching and learning improvement activities:
Student ratings and other information about teaching will be used to determine the type of teaching and learning improvement project that a faculty member may select. If student ratings on the three summary ratings of the IDEA Student Evaluation System are at least average and assuming that the division chair has no additional negative information about the quality of instruction, faculty may select the type of teaching and learning improvement project or projects to be completed. At least one project must include a feedback component on how effective the project was in improving learning. Only a brief summary of the project and results are required to be submitted for evaluation as part of the faculty annual plan and summary. If student ratings on the three summary ratings of the IDEA Student Evaluation System are below average or if the division chair has other documented information leading to concern about the quality of instruction, the faculty member and division chair will complete an analysis and interpretation of student evaluation data and other data to determine whether an improvement is needed in specific areas. If the division chair concludes, based on the analysis of all available data, that improvement is needed in a specific area, the faculty member must develop and implement a project designed to improve teaching and learning in this area. The project must include a significant data collection component designed to gain information on the problem or to measure improvement in the area. The summary submitted for evaluation will be more extensive (usually a minimum of 5 pages) and will include a description of the improvement project, relevant data and an analysis of the data, and samples of appropriate materials. In cases where a faculty member has been granted a course load reduction of fifty percent or more to perform administrative duties, the improvement project in this category might, with the approval of the vice president of academic affairs, be a project designed to improve the division or other area to which the administrator is assigned. In determining the type of project, the vice president of academic affairs will consider student evaluations, evaluations by staff, and other evidence related to the quality of instruction and the quality of administration and leadership in determining the type of project to be completed.
Participation in professional development activities is required each year. Every third year (or the equivalent in multiple years) a substantial portion of the time in the instructional improvement category should be spent in professional development activities designed to update knowledge and skills and must involve significant off-campus activities. In the area of professional development faculty may select one or more of the following:
(In the year of significant professional development, no more than fifty percent of staff development activities can be chosen from letters h, i, and j.)
This category is not required, but faculty may choose to use a portion of the 140 hours in the instructional improvement category to develop and maintain programs based on need in existing and proposed programs. E. Adjunct faculty responsibilities
Policy Manual Review/Revision: 7/1/00 |